HomeAILET PGPractice Questions on Landmark Judgements For CLAT PG 2022

Practice Questions on Landmark Judgements For CLAT PG 2022

  1. The strict guidelines related to arrested persons has been given in the case of 
  • Sakiri Basu Case
  • Husain Aara Khatoon v State of West Bengal
  • D K Basu v State of West Bengal
  • None of these
  1. Gloucester Grammar School Complaint case explained the principle of
  • Damnum sine injuria
  • Injuria sine damno
  • Remoteness of damage
  • Vicarious liability
  1. The principle of ubi jus ibi remedium was recognised in
  • Allen v flood
  • Cults v Chumley
  • Alka v Union of India
  • Ashby v White
  1. Which of the following case decided by the Supreme Court is related to ‘mental cruelty’?
  • Rooplal v Kartaro
  • Sayal v Sarla
  • Dastane v Dastane
  • None of the above
  1. Muhammad Afzal v Ghulam Kasim (1903) ILR 843 is a leading case on which of the following?
  1. Doctrine of election
  2. Doctrine of holding over
  3. Rule against perpetuity
  4. None of the above
  1. S.R. Bommai v Union of India, JT 1994 (2) SC 215 is related to
  1. President Rule in State under Article 356
  2. National Emergency under Article 352
  3. Financial Emergency
  4. None of the above
  1. The NJAC Act was declared unconstitutional in
  • Sakal Chand v Union of India
  • S P Gupta v Union of India
  • SC Adv on Record Association v Union of India
  • In re Presidential reference of 1998
  1. The case relating to Parliamentary Privileges is
  • Keshav Singh v Speaker of The UP Assembly
  • Maneka Gandhi v Union of India
  • Minerva Mills v Union of India
  • A K Gopalan v Union of India
  1. The case of UnniKrishnan v State of Andhra Pradesh deals with which of the following rights?
  • Right to Education
  • Right to go abroad
  • Right to Privacy
  • None of the above
  1. The case of State of Bihar v Kameshwar Singh is related with which of the following doctrines?
  • Doctrine of Eclipse
  • Doctrine of Basic Structure
  • Doctrine of Colourable Legislation
  • Doctrine of Pith and Substance
  1. Principle of Vicarious Liability was first time decided in the case of
  • R v Tolson
  • R v Huggins
  • R v Stephenson
  • R v Prince
  1. The case of K M Nanavati v State of Maharashtra is related to
  • Dacoity
  • Grave and Sudden Provocation
  • Theft
  • Abatement
  1. The case of R v Dudley and Stephen is related to the defence of
  • Necessity
  • Insanity
  • Mistake of fact
  • None of the above
  1. Dhulabhai v State of MP is related to which of the following under CPC?
  • Interim Orders
  • Jurisdiction of Civil Court
  • First Appeals
  • Pleadings
  1. Which of the following is not a leading case on the Dying Declaration?
  • Deep Chand v Rajasthan
  • Khushal Rao v Bombay
  • Moti Singh v UP
  • None of the above
  1. Palvinder Kaur v State of Punjab relates to which of the following?
  • Relevancy of judgements
  • Entries in the book of account
  • Dying Declaration
  • Confession
  1. Queen v Abdulla case law is related to
  • Motive
  • Conduct
  • Consequence
  • None of the above
  1. The landmark case on First Information Report is
  • Neelam Katara v Union of India
  • Lalita Kumari v State of UP
  • Both (a) and (b)
  • None of the above 


  1. (c)
  2. (a)
  3. (d)
  4. (c)
  5. (a)
  6. (a)
  7. (c)
  8. (a)
  9. (a)
  10. (c)
  11. (b)
  12. (b)
  13. (a)
  14. (b)
  15. (a)
  16. (d)
  17. (b)
  18. (b)


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here