Home Legal Reasoning

Legal Reasoning

Most popular
All You Need To Know About Kidnapping and Abduction KIDNAPPING The literal meaning of kidnapping is child stealing. Kidnapping is of two types i.e. kidnapping from India and Kidnapping from lawful guardianship. These two forms of kidnapping may overlap each other. Section 360 of Indian Penal Code (IPC) states that whoever takes a person beyond the limits of India without the consent of such person or any person legally authorized to give consent on his behalf then he shall be liable for the offence of kidnapping from India. ‘India’ means the territory of India excluding the State of Jammu and Kashmir. Under this offence it does not matter that whether the victim is major or minor. If a person attains majority and gives consent for such taking then no offence shall be committed. The age of consent for the purpose of offence of kidnapping is 16 years for boy and 18 years for girls. Section 361 of IPC states that ‘Whoever takes or entices any minor under [sixteen] years of age if a male, or under [eighteen] years of age if a female, or any person of unsound mind, out of the keeping of the lawful guardian of such minor or person of unsound mind, without the consent of such guardian, is said to kidnap such minor or person from lawful guardianship’. The section is intended for the protection of minors and persons of unsound mind. The victim under this offence shall be either a minor under sixteen years of age if a male, or under eighteen years of age if a female or an unsound person. It is necessary that the unsoundness of mind should be permanent and not temporary insanity produced due to intoxication. Following are the essential ingredients of the offence of kidnapping from lawful guardianship: 1. Taking or enticing: the word ‘takes’ means to cause to go, to escort or to get into possession with or without the use of force. Taking need not be constituted by a single act. A whole series of acts might together constitute the process of taking; once the minor has been actually taken out of the keeping of lawful guardian the act is complete. When the accused takes the minor with, whether he was willing or not the act of taking is complete. The word ‘entice’ involves an idea of inducement by exciting hopes or desire in the other. It means alluring or attracting the child to go with the accused. The mental attitude of the minor is relevant in enticing i.e. the act of enticing shall not be complete unless the minor attempts to do a thing which he or she would not have done otherwise. Persuasion by the accused which creates a willingness on the part of minor to be taken out of the keeping of the lawful guardian would be sufficient but if the minor without any inducement goes herself out of the keeping of lawful guardianship and the accused person accompanies her then in such a situation he shall not be liable for the offence. Promise of marriage made to the minor girl for leaving the house of the lawful guardian shall be considered as enticement. Also the distance to which minor is taken away is immaterial. If the accused takes away minor out the keeping of the lawful guardian without the consent of the guardian and after sometime minor returns to his house, still the accused shall be held liable for the offence. 2. Out of keeping of lawful guardian: the word ‘keeping’ means within the protection or care of the guardian. It is not necessary that the minor should be in the physical possession of the guardian. It connotes the idea of charge and protection whether actual or constructive. A child may not always be in direct physical custody of the guardian but as long as the whereabouts of the child are known and there is a control upon the movement of the child, he is said to be within the keeping of the guardian. When a child is taken to such an area outside the circle where the guardian no longer has knowledge of the whereabouts of the child nor any control upon his movements, the child is said to be kidnapped. The guardianship not only includes parents but also persons to whom the custody of the child has been lawfully entrusted e.g. teachers, relatives, servant etc. If the minor is not in the custody of a lawful guardian, the offence cannot be committed. Thus an orphan cannot be kidnapped, similarly, a minor who has abandoned the house of her guardian on her own will and has no intention return, she cannot be considered to continue in keeping of her lawful guardian 3. Without the consent of guardian: the consent of the child is completely immaterial and it is the consent of the guardian alone which is taken into consideration because the child is considered incapable of giving a valid consent. The consent given under this section should be free i.e. it must not have been obtained by fraud or misrepresentation. If the guardian gives consent after the commission of offence, the accused shall still be liable for the offence. It must also be noted that kidnapping is an offence of strict liability i.e. the intention of the accused is immaterial. Thus even if the accused took minor out of the keeping of the guardian for a good cause, he shall still be liable for the offence of kidnapping ABDUCTION Principle: Whoever by force compels, or by any deceitful means induces, any person to go from any place, is said to abduct that person. Abduction is not an age specific offence i.e. it may be committed in respect of any person of any age and the person abducted need not necessarily be in keeping of any body. The offence of abduction shall be complete if the accused takes away the person by deceitful means or by using force with certain intention. The expression ‘deceitful means’ includes a misleading statement. Also there should be an actual use of force and not a mere threat to use force. Abduction is a continuing offence i.e. a person is being abducted both when she is first taken from any place and also when she is removed from one place to another but if the person so moved gives a free and voluntary consent then the accused shall not be liable for the offence. It is also important to note that abduction is auxiliary act i.e. it is not punishable by itself unless accompanied with some criminal intention as specified in IPC. Herein, a particular purpose is necessary to punish the accused.

All You Need To Know About Kidnapping and Abduction

Aditya Anand - 0
elements of crime ipc

Indian Penal Code (IPC): Elements of Crime for DU LLB Entrance...

Aditya Anand - 0
Questions for Practice on Hindu Law

Questions for Practice on Hindu Law

Aditya Anand - 0
Practice Questions on Culpable Homicide and Murder

Practice Questions on Culpable Homicide and Murder

Aditya Anand - 0
Offences Against Property: Theft, Extortion, Robbery and Dacoity

Offences Against Property: Theft, Extortion, Robbery and Dacoity

Aditya Anand - 0

Legal Aptitude for CLAT: Law of Torts: Negligence

Aditya Anand - 0
legal reasoning practice questions

Legal Reasoning Practice Questions for CLAT 2020

Aditya Anand - 0
General Exceptions Under IPC: Infancy and Mistake

General Exceptions Under IPC: Infancy and Mistake

Aditya Anand - 0
practice paper on writs for CLAT

Practice Paper on Writs for Legal Aptitude of CLAT

Aditya Anand - 0
Comprehension Based Practice Questions on Legal Reasoning for CLAT 2020

Comprehension Based Practice Questions on Legal Reasoning for CLAT 2020

Aditya Anand - 0
private defence ipc

Learn All About Private Defence in IPC

Aditya Anand - 0
offences against property ipc notes

Offences Against Property (IPC Notes): Cheating, Mischief and More

Aditya Anand - 0
General Exceptions in IPC: Unsound Mind, Intoxication and Accident

General Exceptions in IPC: Unsound Mind, Intoxication and Accident

Aditya Anand - 0
CLAT legal aptitude law of crimes

CLAT: Legal Aptitude: Law of Crimes

Aditya Anand - 0
past year CLAT questions on Torts

Legal Aptitude: Past Year CLAT Questions on torts

Aditya Anand - 0
Practice Questions on Offences Against Property: Theft, Extortion, Robbery and Dacoity

Practice Questions on Offences Against Property

Aditya Anand - 0
General Exceptions IPC: Necessity, Trifles and Communication in Good Faith

General Exceptions IPC: Necessity, Trifles and Communication in Good Faith

Aditya Anand - 0
Practice Legal Reasoning Questions on New CLAT Pattern 2020

Practice Legal Reasoning Questions on New CLAT Pattern 2020

Aditya Anand - 0
void agreement for clat 2020

Legal Reasoning: Void Agreements for CLAT 2020 

Aditya Anand - 0
legal aptitude constitutional law indian judiciary

Legal Aptitude: Constitutional Law: Indian Judicial System

Aditya Anand - 0
Brief Introduction to Essentials of Contracts

Brief Introduction to Essentials of Contracts

Aditya Anand - 0
Difference between Hurt and Grievous Hurt

Difference Between Hurt and Grievous Hurt under IPC

Aparna Shukla - 0
Legal Aptitude for CLAT: Law of Torts: Nuisance

Legal Aptitude for CLAT: Law of Torts: Nuisance

Aditya Anand - 0
Legal Reasoning for CLAT 2020

Legal Reasoning for CLAT 2020: Introduction to Contracts

Aditya Anand - 0
123...8Page 1 of 8
© 2021 Lawctopus CLATalogue